185-132

The Role of Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Author(s): 
Catherine C. Smith, MD, and
Neil P. Shah, MD, PhD
Article Summary: 


American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, and Transplantation

Targeting Activated Kinases in Acute and Chronic Leukemias

Overview

Multiple small molecule kinase inhibitors are currently undergoing development for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recently, selective and potent FLT3 inhibitors such as AC220 (quizartinib) have proven clinically effective in patients with AML with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations, but inhibitors of other pathologically activated kinases in AML such as c-KIT and JAK2 have achieved less clinical success. Other classes of inhibitors currently undergoing clinical development target mediators of downstream signaling pathways such as mTOR and MEK or cell cycle machinery such as aurora kinases, PLK1, or cyclin-dependent kinases. Other than FLT3 inhibitors, most inhibitors have achieved only rare bone marrow responses, and kinase inhibitor therapy in AML remains investigational. Continuing efforts to develop kinase inhibitors for the treatment of AML will require careful selection of patients for clinical trials, translational studies to characterize responders, and investigation of combination therapy that may be capable of improving response rates and duration.

The ability of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib to effect deep and sustained remissions in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has sparked continuing efforts to achieve similar results in other hematologic malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the molecular heterogeneity of AML has limited the ability of kinase inhibitors to achieve broad success in this disease, despite evidence of frequent pathologic activation via mutation of kinases such as FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3),1-3 KIT,4,5 and other signaling molecules such as RAS.6-8 Kinase inhibitor therapy in AML has been complicated by difficulty in developing potent and selective inhibitors, as well as by the question of whether observed mutations are truly “addicting” and, therefore, represent valid therapeutic targets whose successful inhibition would be predicted to result in true disease remissions. It is also unclear whether clinical benefit will be restricted to patients harboring any mutation in the target gene, those with a specific subset of mutations, or would also include patients whose disease demonstrates overexpression of the intended target in the absence of a structural mutation. Finally, the optimal use and timing of kinase inhibitors in AML therapy is unclear—as monotherapy in remission induction and maintenance or in sequence or combination with other therapies such as traditional chemotherapy, novel pathway inhibitors, or hypomethylating agents. This article will review classes of investigational kinase inhibitors in AML and their potential role in the treatment of AML.

FLT3 INHIBITORS

Among the most common genetic lesions in AML are constitutively activating mutations of the FLT3 receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK). Internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations in FLT3 are detected in approximately 20% of AML cases and are associated with poor prognosis.9,10 Another 5% to 10% of patients with AML express constitutively activating point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD), commonly at the activation loop (AL) residue D835.2,3 Efforts to effectively target FLT3 in AML have been fervent and longstanding, but initial attempts were largely unsuccessful, resulting in only transient reductions in peripheral blasts with few bone marrow responses.11,12 First-generation FLT3 inhibitors suffered from lack of potency, selectivity, and favorable pharmacokinetic properties.13 In addition, data has suggested that FLT3 mutations are secondary rather than initiating genetic lesions in AML, hinting that FLT3 mutations may not be critical for disease pathogenesis.14-16

The recent success of the investigational FLT3 inhibitor AC220 (quizartinib) in achieving a composite complete remission (CR) rate of approximately 50% in a phase II study in patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-ITD-positive AML17,18 has rekindled interest in FLT3 as a therapeutic target, although most AC220-responsive patients experienced incomplete recovery of peripheral blood counts despite clearance of bone marrow blasts. The evolution of TKD mutations in eight of eight patients who experienced relapse after a bone marrow response on AC220 confirmed that clinical responses in these patients were achieved by FLT3 inhibition and that relapses were mediated by the reactivation of FLT3 kinase activity.19 Resistance mutations occurred at the “gatekeeper” residue in FLT3, F691, recurrently mutated to a leucine (3 patients) and most frequently at the activation loop residue D835 (6 patients) (including one patient who developed both an F691L and D835V mutation), suggesting that substitutions at the D835 residue may be a common problematic cause of resistance to AC220. Mutations at D835 have also been associated with clinical resistance to sorafenib, which has also been reported to be clinically active in FLT3-ITD-positive AML.20 These findings validate FLT3-ITD as a therapeutic target and further suggest that “cooperating” genetic lesions such as FLT3-ITD, which are believed to occur relatively late during evolution of the malignant clone, can remain critically important for the survival of cells in which they arise. It is not yet clear whether other FLT3 activating mutations (such as point mutations at D835 in the absence of an ITD) are equally valid therapeutic targets, as clinical experience in this population has been limited and both AC220 and sorafenib appear inactive against these mutations.19-21

The rapid emergence of resistance-conferring FLT3 TKD mutations in patients who respond to AC220 underscores the need for additional clinically effective FLT3 inhibitors with activity against AC220-resistant mutants. As stated previously, although the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved multikinase inhibitor sorafenib has achieved remissions in FLT3-ITD-positive AML,20,22 it appears to be vulnerable to the same spectrum of KD mutations as AC220.19 The ABL/FLT3 inhibitor ponatinib, recently FDA-approved for the treatment of TKI-resistant CML, achieved CR in two of seven patients with TKI-naïve FLT3-ITD-positive AML treated on a phase I study23 and appears to have activity against AC220-resistant FLT3 gatekeeper mutations at F691.24 However, ponatinib's clinical activity and its ability to suppress the AC220-resistant F691L mutation needs to be assessed in larger clinical trial experience. Other inhibitors with in vitro activity against AC220-resistant FLT3 KD mutations are currently undergoing clinical trial evaluation in FLT3-mutant AML, including PLX3397 (which has equipotent activity against the FLT3 F691L mutant)25 and crenolanib (active against the broadly-resistant D835 mutants),26,27 but clinical evidence of activity has yet to be reported.

Although AC220 has demonstrated an impressive rate of remission induction in patients with chemotherapy-refractory FLT3-ITD-positive AML, most remissions do not meet traditional CR criteria and instead represent clearance of bone marrow blasts with incomplete recovery of blood counts (CRi). Additionally, instead of the hypocellular response associated with chemotherapy, AC220 response in many patients appears to be associated with a syndrome of terminal myeloid differentiation resulting in marrow hypercellularity associated with a neutrophil surge and inflammatory tissue infiltrates.28 These observations suggest that remissions in AML achieved with kinase inhibitor treatment may appear different from those achieved with standard chemotherapy and that response criteria may need to be adjusted accordingly. It remains to be seen if remissions associated with incomplete count recovery will translate to increased overall survival. In the case of patients who are eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplant, the best use of kinase inhibitor therapy may be as a bridge to transplant.

INHIBITORS OF OTHER CONSTITUTIVELY ACTIVATED KINASES: C-KIT AND JAK2

In contrast to the recent experience with FLT3, no other activated kinase has yet clearly proven to be an effective therapeutic target in AML. Activating mutations in c-KIT in the form of insertion or deletion mutations in exon 8 or as point mutations in the activation loop in exon 17 (commonly at residue D816) occur in about 2% of AML cases29 and are enriched in core binding factor AML, where they are reported to occur in approximately 30% of patients with inversion 16 (16% within exon 17 and 13% within exon 8) and 22% of patients with t(8;21) (18% within exon 17 and 4% within exon 8).5 No clinical trials have assessed the efficacy of KIT inhibitors in patients with AML with KIT mutations; notably, all clinically available KIT inhibitors appear to be inactive against KIT D816 mutations.30 KIT inhibitors have, however, achieved mixed success in patients with c-KIT overexpression. In case reports, KIT inhibitors SU541631 and imatinib32 induced remission in patients with c-KIT overexpression, and in one pilot phase II study, five of 21 patients with AML with c-KIT overexpression responded to imatinib, including two patients harboring a low percentage of bone marrow blasts who achieved CR when treated with imatinib shortly following chemotherapy.33 However, two other studies reported no responses in patients with AML with c-KIT expression.34,35 In the case of responders, it is unclear if responses were actually achieved via KIT inhibition. It is likely that the therapeutic potential of KIT inhibition in AML will not be truly tested until KIT inhibitors with activity against commonly found activating KIT mutations (i.e., D816V) are available and clinical trials in well-selected patient populations are performed in the setting of careful correlative studies designed to identify predictors of response.

Activating JAK2 V617F mutations, though commonly found in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN),36 are rare in AML37,38 and are most frequently identified in patients with a pre-existing MPN. Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor recently FDA-approved for the treatment of advanced myelofibrosis, has been assessed in a phase II clinical trial in relapsed/refractory leukemias.39 In this trial, three of 38 patients achieved CR (one with incomplete count recovery); all three who responded had post-MPN AML (two of three were JAK2V617F mutation positive). However, there was no significant difference in JAK2V617F allele burden in assessed responders or in any other patient; thus, it is unclear if these responses were achieved via inhibition of JAK2 or another kinase. The potential role of ruxolitinib and other JAK2 inhibitors in the treatment of post-MPN AML remains unclear.

THE ROLE OF PATHWAY INHIBITORS: INHIBITORS OF MTOR AND MEK

Given the difficulty of targeting individual mutated kinases, either because of lack of inhibitors with clinical efficacy against particular mutations or the inherent difficulty of “drugging” the target (as is the case of RAS mutations, which result in isoforms with decreased enzymatic activity not amenable to “inhibition” in the traditional sense40), there has been considerable interest in developing inhibitors of signaling pathways downstream of these kinases. This strategy has yet to yield convincing evidence of clinical efficacy, a result likely partially attributable to lack of patient selection as well poor understanding of how oncogenic signaling pathways are perturbed in individual patients.

TABLE 1. Kinase Inhibitors Investigated in AML

Target Inhibitors Reported Single-Agent Composite Remission Rate (CR + CRi) AML Patient Population
FLT3 AC220 44–54%17,18 FLT3-ITD+
Sorafenib Anecdotal22; 92%20 FLT3-ITD+
PLX397 NA FLT3-ITD+
Crenolanib NA Any FLT3 mutation
KIT Imatinib Anecdotal32; *10%33 KIT overexpression
SU5416 Anecdotal31 KIT overexpression
JAK2 Ruxolitinib 8%39 Post-MPN AML
mTOR Rapamycin None43 Unselected
Everolimus None44 Unselected
Deforolimus None45 Unselected
MEK Trametinib 19%46 RAS-mutant leukemia (includes other leukemias)
Aurora Kinase AZD1152 14%48 Unselected
MLN8237 1 patient49 Unselected
CDK Dinaciclib None53 Unselected
PLK1 Volasertib 3%53 Unselected

Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CR, complete remission; CRi, incomplete recovery of blood counts; NA, not assessed; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasms; CDK, cyclin dependent kinase; PLK1, polo-like kinase 1.

*Patients with less than 5% blasts at start of treatment

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a serine/threonine kinase involved in the regulation of cell growth and proliferation and is a downstream effector of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and the phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathways known to be activated by mutated FLT341 and KIT.42 In a pilot study of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin in nine unselected patients with relapsed/refractory AML, four patients responded with 50% or more decrease in blood or bone marrow blasts, but no CRs were achieved.43 In a phase I study of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, no responses were observed in nine patients with AML treated.44 Similarly, in a larger phase II study, deforolimus (AP23573), a novel nonprodrug rapamycin analog, had little effect in an AML population, with only one of 22 patients achieving hematologic improvement without bone marrow response.45

Mitogen-activated extracellular signal-related kinase (MEK) is a key effector of the MAPK pathway that has recently been successfully targeted in metastatic melanoma cases with the activating BRAF V600E mutation. Trametinib (GSK1120212), is an oral MEK inhibitor that has successfully extended progression-free and overall survival in a phase III open-label trial in patients with metastatic melanoma.46 Trametinib is currently undergoing phase I/II evaluation in relapsed/refractory myeloid malignancies, including AML. Recently, an overall response rate of 28% in RAS-mutant leukemias was reported, with 11 of 57 patients with N- or K-RAS mutations achieving bone marrow CR (19%; some with incomplete count recovery).47 No patient without a RAS mutation achieved a bone marrow CR, further underscoring the importance of appropriate patient selection in kinase inhibitor therapy.

TARGETING MITOSIS AND CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION: INHIBITORS OF AURORA KINASE, PLK1, AND CDK

With the goal of targeting additional downstream mediators and potentially expanding the population of patients who might benefit from kinase inhibitor therapy beyond those with detectable signaling mutations, recent clinical efforts have explored the therapeutic potential of inhibitors targeting kinases that are important in cell cycle progression and mitosis, such as aurora kinases, polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), and cyclin dependent kinases (CDK).

Aurora kinases are a family of highly conserved serine–threonine protein kinases that play key roles in mitosis and have been shown to be overexpressed in human leukemias. Aurora A plays a key role in centrosome maturation, spindle assembly, meiotic maturation, and metaphase I spindle orientation. Aurora B kinase is a critical component of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) that mediates chromosome condensation, chromosome orientation on the mitotic spindle and the spindle-assembly checkpoint, as well as the final stages of cytokinesis.48 Several studies of aurora kinase inhibitors in AML have reported promising results. In a phase I/II study in AML, AZD1152, an inhibitor of aurora kinase B, induced responses in 25% of patients (64 patients), including nine CRs across the phase I and II portions (6 with incomplete count recovery).49 A phase II study in AML and myelodysplastic syndrome of MLN8237, an oral inhibitor of aurora kinase A, reported a 13% response rate (in 57 patients), including one CR ongoing with 1 year of follow-up at the time of the report.50

Targeting cell cycle checkpoint regulators also appears to have some favorable activity in AML. CDKs are known to play an important role in regulating cell cycle progression.51 Similarly, PLK1 also plays a role in cell cycle checkpoint control and control of mitotic progression, particularly metaphase–anaphase transition and mitotic exit.52 Recently dinaciclib, a potent and selective inhibitor of CDKs 1, 2, 5, and 9 demonstrated some ability to reduce peripheral and bone marrow blasts in patients with AML in a phase II study in advanced acute leukemias.53 Volasertib (BI 2536), an inhibitor of PLK1 has also demonstrated some activity in a phase I/II monotherapy study in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory AML, achieving one CR, one CRi, and one partial response (PR).54 In an interim analysis of an open-label, randomized study of low-dose ara-C (LDAC) with or without volasertib, volasertib appeared to potentiate the effect of chemotherapy in patients with AML ineligible for intensive therapy; a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving volasertib plus LDAC achieved a CR or CRi compared with patients who received LDAC alone (31.0% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.0277), including a trend toward improved event-free survival.55

THE ROLE OF COMBINATION THERAPY

At the present time, kinase inhibitor therapy in AML remains investigational, and in the majority of cases, bone marrow responses in the form of CR or CRi have been the exception rather than the rule with monotherapy. However, even in the case of FLT3-ITD-positive AML, where the use of the selective and potent FLT3 inhibitor AC220 has impressively achieved an approximately 50% composite CR rate in a relapsed/refractory population as a single agent, questions remain about the optimal use and timing of these inhibitors that are applicable to the use of all such inhibitors in AML treatment.

Can response rates be improved when combined with chemotherapy or with hypomethylating agents? Although the first generation FLT3 inhibitor CEP701 showed no benefit when added to salvage chemotherapy in FLT3 mutant AML,55 it may be that inhibitors with improved single agent activity such as AC220 would have additional beneficial effect in combination with chemotherapy, either to improve remission rates or to lower the likelihood of relapse. Currently, a phase I study testing the safety and tolerability of AC220 in combination with chemotherapy is ongoing. Illustrating the potential strength of a combination strategy, however, a recent study of sorafenib combined with 5-azacitadine reported a high 44% response rate in relapsed/refractory FLT3-ITD-positive AML, including 10 patients (29%) with CRi, four patients (12%) with CR, and one patient (3%) with PR (who experienced clearance of bone marrow blasts down to 6%).58 Other studies have indicated the feasibility and tolerability of kinase inhibitors when used in combination with chemotherapy.59 In the future, as more effective FLT3 inhibitors are developed, combination strategies involving FLT3 inhibitors with non-overlapping resistance profiles or of FLT3 inhibitors and other downstream inhibitors may be capable of minimizing resistance mechanisms and improving overall response rates. Finally, given the high rate of relapse in patients with FLT3-ITD-positive AML, a strategy of FLT3 inhibitor maintenance therapy either after induction chemotherapy or after stem cell transplant may be an additional strategy to maintain remission and improve outcomes.

CONCLUSION

With the clinical success of AC220 in FLT3-ITD-positive AML and clear evidence from translational studies that responses (and relapses) are mediated via FLT3 kinase activity, the therapeutic potential of kinase inhibitor therapy in AML has just begun to be realized. In the case of other kinase inhibitors, however, deep bone marrow responses have been rare, and little is known about the true mechanism of action of these agents or predictors of response. It is not yet clear whether mutations in c-KIT, JAK2, or RAS are truly “addicting” in human AML and, therefore, valid therapeutic targets. In all these cases, it will be important to develop further selective and potent inhibitors, ideally effective against all clinically relevant mutations in the target kinase, and to properly select for treatment patients whose leukemias are most likely to be dependent on the activity of the target kinase. When patients do respond, it will be important to perform rigorous molecular characterization of their disease to elucidate the mechanism of response. In the case of cell cycle inhibitors, modest response rates have been observed and may be improved if inhibitors are combined with chemotherapy. For all inhibitors, further work will be needed to define and overcome resistance mechanisms and determine whether to utilize inhibitors alone or in combination with other drugs to achieve optimal clinical outcomes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Dr. Smith has a Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Career Development Award for Special Fellows; Dr. Shah is a Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Scholar in Clinical Research.

Key Points

  • AML is molecularly heterogeneous, and it is unlikely that any single class of small molecule inhibitor will be broadly clinically effective.
  • Selective and potent FLT3 inhibitors such as AC220 are highly active in patients with AML who have FLT3-ITD mutations, but most responders with bone marrow remissions have incomplete recovery of blood counts; rapid relapse is common and associated with reactivation of FLT3 kinase activity via drug resistant kinase domain mutations.
  • Anecdotal remissions have been reported with inhibitors of KIT and JAK2, but it is unclear if responses have been achieved through inhibition of the target kinase, and the role of these inhibitors in AML therapy remains unclear.
  • Inhibitors of downstream signaling pathways and cell cycle mediators are undergoing clinical development, but have not yet proven broadly clinically effective and may be best utilized in selected patient populations.
  • Small molecule kinase inhibitors may prove more effective in AML when utilized in combination with other targeted agents or chemotherapy.

References

1. Nakao M, Yokota S, Iwai T, et al. Internal tandem duplication of the flt3 gene found in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 1996;10:1911-1918.
PubMed
2. Abu-Duhier FM, Goodeve AC, Wilson GA, et al. Identification of novel FLT-3 Asp835 mutations in adult acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2001;113:983-988.
PubMed | CrossRef
3. Yamamoto Y, Kiyoi H, Nakano Y, et al. Activating mutation of D835 within the activation loop of FLT3 in human hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2001;97:2434-2439.
PubMed | CrossRef
4. Gari M, Goodeve A, Wilson G, et al. c-kit proto-oncogene exon 8 in-frame deletion plus insertion mutations in acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 1999;105:894-900.
PubMed | CrossRef
5. Paschka P, Marcucci G, Ruppert AS, et al. Adverse prognostic significance of KIT mutations in adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16) and t(8;21): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3904-3911.
PubMed | CrossRef
6. Stirewalt DL, Kopecky KJ, Meshinchi S, et al. FLT3, RAS, and TP53 mutations in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2001;97:3589-3595.
PubMed | CrossRef
7. Bacher U, Haferlach T, Schoch C, et al. Implications of NRAS mutations in AML: A study of 2502 patients. Blood. 2006;107:3847-3853.
PubMed | CrossRef
8. Bowen DT, Frew ME, Hills R, et al. RAS mutation in acute myeloid leukemia is associated with distinct cytogenetic subgroups but does not influence outcome in patients younger than 60 years. Blood. 2005;106:2113-2119.
PubMed | CrossRef
9. Abu-Duhier FM, Goodeve AC, Wilson GA, et al. FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations in adult acute myeloid leukaemia define a high-risk group. Br J Haematol. 2000;111:190-195.
PubMed | CrossRef
10. Kottaridis PD, Gale RE, Frew ME, et al. The presence of a FLT3 internal tandem duplication in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) adds important prognostic information to cytogenetic risk group and response to the first cycle of chemotherapy: Analysis of 854 patients from the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML 10 and 12 trials. Blood. 2001;98:1752-1759.
PubMed | CrossRef
11. Stone RM, DeAngelo DJ, Klimek V, et al. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia and an activating mutation in FLT3 respond to a small-molecule FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, PKC412. Blood. 2005;105:54-60.
PubMed | CrossRef
12. Knapper S, Burnett AK, Littlewood T, et al. A phase 2 trial of the FLT3 inhibitor lestaurtinib (CEP701) as first-line treatment for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia not considered fit for intensive chemotherapy. Blood. 2006;108:3262-3270.
PubMed | CrossRef
13. Pratz KW, Cortes J, Roboz GJ, et al. A pharmacodynamic study of the FLT3 inhibitor KW-2449 yields insight into the basis for clinical response. Blood. 2009;113:3938-3946.
PubMed | CrossRef
14. Kelly LM, Liu Q, Kutok JL, et al. FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations associated with human acute myeloid leukemias induce myeloproliferative disease in a murine bone marrow transplant model. Blood. 2002;99:310-318.
PubMed | CrossRef
15. Shih LY, Huang CF, Wu JH, et al. Internal tandem duplication of FLT3 in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: A comparative analysis of bone marrow samples from 108 adult patients at diagnosis and relapse. Blood. 2002;100:2387-2392.
PubMed | CrossRef
16. McCormick SR, McCormick MJ, Grutkoski PS, et al. FLT3 mutations at diagnosis and relapse in acute myeloid leukemia: Cytogenetic and pathologic correlations, including cuplike blast morphology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134:1143-1151.
PubMed
17. Cortes JE, Perl AE, Dombret H, et al. Final Results of a Phase 2 Open-Label, Monotherapy Efficacy and Safety Study of Quizartinib (AC220) in Patients >= 60 Years of Age with FLT3 ITD Positive or Negative Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2012;120:48.
18. Levis MJ, Perl AE, Dombret H, et al. Final Results of a Phase 2 Open-Label, Monotherapy Efficacy and Safety Study of Quizartinib (AC220) in Patients with FLT3-ITD Positive or Negative Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Second-Line Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2012;120:673.
19. Smith CC, Wang Q, Chin CS, et al. Validation of ITD mutations in FLT3 as a therapeutic target in human acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2012;485:260-263.
PubMed | CrossRef
20. Man CH, Fung TK, Ho C, et al. Sorafenib treatment of FLT3-ITD+ acute myeloid leukemia: Favorable initial outcome and mechanisms of subsequent non-responsiveness associated with a D835 mutation. Blood. 2012;199:5133-5143.
CrossRef
21. Smith CC, Chin J, Lasater E, et al. Constitutively Activating Mutations At the FLT3 Activation Loop Residue D835 Are Associated with Clinical Resistance to AC220. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2012;120:674.
22. Metzelder S, Wang Y, Wollmer E, et al. Compassionate use of sorafenib in FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia: Sustained regression before and after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2009;113:6567-6571.
PubMed | CrossRef
23. Talpaz M, Shah NP, Deininger MW, et al. Ponatinib in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Preliminary findings from a phase I study in hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:15s((suppl; abstr 6518).
24. Smith CC, Lasater EA, Zhu X, et al. Activity of the ponatinib against clinically-relevant AC220-resistant kinase domain mutants of FLT3-ITD. Blood. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
25. Smith CC, Perl AE, Lasater E, et al. PLX3397 Is An Investigational Selective FLT3 Inhibitor That Retains Activity Against the Clinically-Relevant FLT3-ITD/F691L “Gatekeeper” Mutation in Vitro. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2011;118:764.
26. Smith CC, Lasater E, Mccreery M, et al. Crenolanib (CP-868,596) Is a Potent and Selective Type I FLT3 Inhibitor That Retains Activity Against AC220 Resistance-Causing FLT3 Kinase Domain Mutants. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2012;120:141.
27. Galanis A, Rajkhowa T, Muralidhara C, et al. Crenolanib Is A Highly Potent, Selective, FLT3 TKI with Activity Against D835 Mutations. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2012;120:1341.
28. Sexauer A, Perl A, Yang X, et al. Terminal myeloid differentiation in vivo is induced by FLT3 inhibition in FLT3/ITD AML. Blood. 2012;120:4205-4214.
PubMed | CrossRef
29. Schnittger S, Kohl TM, Haferlach T, et al. KIT-D816 mutations in AML1-ETO-positive AML are associated with impaired event-free and overall survival. Blood. 2006;107:1791-1799.
PubMed | CrossRef
30. Gajiwala KS, Wu JC, Christensen J, et al. KIT kinase mutants show unique mechanisms of drug resistance to imatinib and sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:1542-1547.
PubMed | CrossRef
31. Mesters RM, Padro T, Bieker R, et al. Stable remission after administration of the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU5416 in a patient with refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2001;98:241-243.
PubMed | CrossRef
32. Kindler T, Breitenbuecher F, Marx A, et al. Sustained complete hematologic remission after administration of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate in a patient with refractory, secondary AML. Blood. 2003;101:2960-2962.
PubMed | CrossRef
33. Kindler T, Breitenbuecher F, Marx A, et al. Efficacy and safety of imatinib in adult patients with c-kit-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2004;103:3644-3654.
PubMed | CrossRef
34. Piccaluga PP, Malagola M, Rondoni M, et al. Imatinib mesylate in the treatment of newly diagnosed or refractory/resistant c-KIT positive acute myeloid leukemia. Results of an Italian Multicentric Phase II Study. Haematologica. 2007;92:1721-1722.
PubMed | CrossRef
35. Cortes J, Giles F, O'Brien S, et al. Results of imatinib mesylate therapy in patients with refractory or recurrent acute myeloid leukemia, high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, and myeloproliferative disorders. Cancer. 2003;97:2760-2766.
PubMed | CrossRef
36. Lippert E, Boissinot M, Kralovics R, et al. The JAK2-V617F mutation is frequently present at diagnosis in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. Blood. 2006;108:1865-1867.
PubMed | CrossRef
37. Illmer T, Schaich M, Ehninger G, et al. Tyrosine kinase mutations of JAK2 are rare events in AML but influence prognosis of patients with CBF-leukemias. Haematologica. 2007;92:137-138.
PubMed | CrossRef
38. Levine RL, Loriaux M, Huntly BJ, et al. The JAK2V617F activating mutation occurs in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia, but not in acute lymphoblastic leukemia or chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2005;106:3377-3379.
PubMed | CrossRef
39. Eghtedar A, Verstovsek S, Estrov Z, et al. Phase 2 study of the JAK kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with refractory leukemias, including postmyeloproliferative neoplasm acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012;119:4614-4618.
PubMed | CrossRef
40. Ward AF, Braun BS, Shannon KM. Targeting oncogenic Ras signaling in hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2012;120:3397-3406.
PubMed | CrossRef
41. Stirewalt DL, Radich JP. The role of FLT3 in haematopoietic malignancies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:650-665.
PubMed | CrossRef
42. Ronnstrand L. Signal transduction via the stem cell factor receptor/c-Kit. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;61:2535-2548.
PubMed | CrossRef
43. Recher C, Beyne-Rauzy O, Demur C, et al. Antileukemic activity of rapamycin in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2005;105:2527-2534.
PubMed | CrossRef
44. Yee KW, Zeng Z, Konopleva M, et al. Phase I/II study of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5165-5173.
PubMed | CrossRef
45. Rizzieri DA, Feldman E, Dipersio JF, et al. A phase 2 clinical trial of deforolimus (AP23573, MK-8669), a novel mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2756-2762.
PubMed | CrossRef
46. Flaherty KT, Robert C, Hersey P, et al. Improved Survival with MEK Inhibition in BRAF-Mutated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:107-114.
PubMed | CrossRef
47. Borthakur G, Popplewell L, Boyiadzis M, et al. Phase I/II Trial of the MEK1/2 Inhibitor Trametinib (GSK1120212) in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloid Malignancies: Evidence of Activity in Patients with RAS Mutation-Positive Disease. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2012;120:677.
48. Moore AS, Blagg J, Linardopoulos S, et al. Aurora kinase inhibitors: Novel small molecules with promising activity in acute myeloid and Philadelphia-positive leukemias. Leukemia. 2010;24:671-678.
PubMed | CrossRef
49. Lowenberg B, Muus P, Ossenkoppele G, et al. Phase 1/2 study to assess the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of barasertib (AZD1152) in patients with advanced acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2011;118:6030-6036.
PubMed | CrossRef
50. Goldberg SL, Fenaux P, Craig MD, et al. Phase 2 Study of MLN8237, An Investigational Aurora A Kinase (AAK) Inhibitor In Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS). ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2010;116:3273.
51. Malumbres M, Barbacid M. To cycle or not to cycle: A critical decision in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001;1:222-231.
PubMed | CrossRef
52. Strebhardt K, Ullrich A. Targeting polo-like kinase 1 for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:321-330.
PubMed | CrossRef
53. Gojo I, Walker A, Cooper M, et al. Phase II Study of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) Inhibitor Dinaciclib (SCH 727965) In Patients with Advanced Acute Leukemias. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2010;116:3287.
54. Muller-Tidow C, Bug G, Schlenk R, et al. Phase I/II Study of BI 2536, An Intravenous Polo-Like Kinase-1 (Plk-1) Inhibitor, in Elderly Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): First Results of a Multi-Center Trial. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2008;112:2973.
55. Maertens J, Lubbert M, Fiedler W, et al. Phase I/II Study of Volasertib (BI 6727), an Intravenous Polo-Like Kinase (Plk) Inhibitor, in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Results From the Randomized Phase II Part for Volasertib in Combination with Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) Versus LDAC Monotherapy in Patients with Previously Untreated AML Ineligible for Intensive Treatment. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2012;120:411.
56. Levis M, Ravandi F, Wang ES, et al. Results from a randomized trial of salvage chemotherapy followed by lestaurtinib for patients with FLT3 mutant AML in first relapse. Blood. 2011;117:3294-3301.
PubMed | CrossRef
57. Stone RM, Fischer T, Paquette R, et al. Phase IB study of the FLT3 kinase inhibitor midostaurin with chemotherapy in younger newly diagnosed adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2012;26:2061-2068.
PubMed | CrossRef
58. Ravandi F, Alattar ML, Levis MJ, et al. Combination of Sorafenib and 5-Azacytidine Has Significant Activity in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory or Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia and FLT3-ITD mutation. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2012;120:1519.
59. Amadori S, Stasi R, Martelli AM, et al. Temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in combination with lower-dose clofarabine as salvage therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: results of a phase II GIMEMA study (AML-1107). Br J Haematol. 2012;156:205-212.
PubMed | CrossRef